One of the things I noticed here in Bucharest is the popularity of the Motorola V975) shown in the picture. It is currently offered by Connex, which was recently bought by the Vodafone Group (the biggest telecom deal in Romania in 15 years, announced in March 2005). Of course, my cousin has one and it looks pretty cool (there are lots of features, such as push-to-video, ringtones, and lots of multimedia applets). Amazing to see 3G so widely available and deployed. Other mobile providers in Romania include Orange and Cosmorom.
|
||||
Ronald Gruia All rights reserved Login
Recent Photos
Recent Comments
This Month
Month Archive
Other Interesting Blogs
|
Sunday, August 28
by
Ronald
on Sun 28 Aug 2005 06:12 PM EDT
Saturday, August 27
by
Ronald
on Sat 27 Aug 2005 06:51 PM EDT
Wednesday, August 24
by
Ronald
on Wed 24 Aug 2005 12:58 AM EDT
Telcotrash (hat tip: Andy Abramson) reports on three VoIP MSO deals in Colombia, all with CedarPoint Communications. Interesting to see this unfold in Latin America. The three companies are: TVCable (in Bogota), Promision (in Bucamaranga) and Costavision (in Cartagena) - all together make up about 1 million subs. more »
by
Ronald
on Wed 24 Aug 2005 12:27 AM EDT
As a few follow-ups to yesterday's entry: 1- Google Talk is up and running (if you visit http://talk.google.com, you will get automatically redirected). Thus far, I just had a quick test, and it seems to be find (albeit I could not see any different vis-a-vis Yahoo! Messenger as of yet, or Skype, for that matter - except for the connection to the GMail inbox, which Skype does not have ;-). 2- Yet another great coup for GIPS (Global IP Sound). As I mentioned before, the Swedish CODEC maker is a great company, and whoever buys it, will certainly cause a lot of disruption. IMHO, GIPS could be a very astute purchase for anyone willing to buy it. more »Tuesday, August 23
by
Ronald
on Tue 23 Aug 2005 02:35 AM EDT
The resourceful Om Malik figures out a key part of the Google puzzle. He claims that the new product to be introduced by the search engine giant will be an IM client using Jabber (self-proclaimed "the Linux of IM" - hey, if their stuff works for AOL and Orange, then why not Google?). Om also points to a couple of extra hints: the talk.google.com URL, which redirects you to a google.com/talk with a 404 message (site not found) with a secure XMPP server waiting for connections. In the meantime, here are the del.icio.us tags on Google & Jabber... this will be an ongoing thread. Note: on the above link, there is a good piece by Sean Kerner highlighting, among other things that with the Blogger acquisition, Google also got some IM technology (called Hello). more »
by
Ronald
on Tue 23 Aug 2005 02:19 AM EDT
Robert Scoble writes about ScreenCastsOnline, a site that "contains downloadable and streaming screencasts to give you tips and hints in using many mac and web based applications. Windows users are welcome to access the screencasts as many of the demos will be cross platform or platform independent." Definitely worth a visit... more »Monday, August 22
by
Ronald
on Mon 22 Aug 2005 11:56 PM EDT
Andy Abramson had his own take today on Google's raising of $4+ billion (a non-trivial amount, as pointed out by Cody Willard in his note today - more than10% of GM's and Ford's combined market caps). I would have to agree with Andy - the proceeds of this sale are not for Skype (or Sk-hype, as Om affectionately refers to the company). Google's management is astute and too pragmatic for that. But then, Andy makes a whole plethora of telco plays (including a softphone SIP client, buying RIM or a directory service play). Some folks (like John Markoff from the NY Times) suggest that Google will continue to make small R&D-focused acquisitions such as Android (click here for an interesting insight on that transaction, including a battle with Microsoft for being the leading software agent in the wireless search segment of China's mobile phone market). Which gets us back to what will GOOG do with the money? Well, I still think that for M&A's of small companies (or even slightly bigger ones), cash is certainly not needed (instead the stock can be used as currency), or it if is, it certainly will not be anywhere near the vicinity of $4b billion. So I dare speculate that it could very well be a telco play. But one that involves deployment of infrastructure. And which infrastructure? Wireless! Broadband wireless, be it WiFi, WiMax, or even proprietary. There is a big opportunity for the emergence of a third competitor that could offer triple play services in the US (not a telco, and not an MSO). If such a player comes up with a good, basic wireless service (one that is "good enough" will do), eventually complements it with an MVNO to offer voice, video and data and then prices it below the current oligopolistic equilibrium price between ILECs and MSOs, that will create some real competition and a major threat to the incumbents. How much would it cost to set up such a nationwide network? For Wi-Fi, we have already some parameters (the City of Philadelphia Wi-Fi project will cost an estimated $10 million). For WiMax, the time horizon is much larger, so I really do not believe that the offering equity should have been now, unless Google management wanted to crystallize some of its winnings right now to build a considerable kitty of cash. But hey, maybe this is too far down the road. Google is raising this money here and now, and so it could very well be that it could be to create its own IMMM (Instant Multi-Media Messaging) client application (allowing the sharing of video and audio files via video/audio streaming, IM, etc.). more »Saturday, August 20
by
Ronald
on Sat 20 Aug 2005 02:29 PM EDT
In a recent SEC filing, Google said it plans to sell up to 14.8 million shares (the highly connected and resourceful Om Malik even has some details about who is selling how much - just click on the Stalwart link in his article). Based on Google's closing price on Friday of $280.00, the company could raise $4.144 billion, or about 5.3% of its current market value. Paul Kedrosky speculates on what are some of the things that Google can afford with the proceeds of all this cash. There are some rumors about a possible telecom play - James Enck wrote a bit about those. Looks like Fred Wilson's is bang on with his "relevance vector" story - it's going to take more than just simply searching, and this is proof that Google's management is aware of this and will put some of those resources into play - the only question is why the cash when they could leverage the high current stock price? Stay tuned - this story is still developing. more »
Friday, August 19
by
Ronald
on Fri 19 Aug 2005 11:50 PM EDT
Tom Evslin wrote a great insight on a piece authored by Bernard Moon on who to hire for a startup. Both stories are great - I liked particularly the quote given by John Doerr of Kleiner Perkins: “You must ask, 'Are these the people I want to be in trouble with for the next 5, 10, 15 years of my life?' Because as you build a new business, one thing's for sure: You will get into trouble.” Read it all! more »Thursday, August 18
by
Ronald
on Thu 18 Aug 2005 11:25 AM EDT
The story is Copyright © National Post 2005. more » Wednesday, August 17
by
Ronald
on Wed 17 Aug 2005 12:24 AM EDT
Tuesday, August 16
by
Ronald
on Tue 16 Aug 2005 11:41 PM EDT
Fred Wilson had a great post today about the evolution from the OS to the browser to the search engine to ... the new dimension whatever that is. Better put, Fred does not believe that search itself is not the ultimate component of the relevance vector. He believes in user preferences, behaviors, cached information (including cookies), etc. However, there are many sophisticated Internet users that constantly clear out their cached browser information, or setup their browsers not to receive any cookies (yours truly included). For these types of users, the relevance vector needs to be made up by something else. And even if one could observe certain behavioral patterns, and start creating rules, there are many things that don't quite work on the web (for instance, imagine the difficulty in trying to guess estimate the probability of a user actually buying something on the web, depending on the number of ads he/she clicked on). So this will not be an easy endeavor by any stretch of imagination. But it is an interesting line of thought... and food for some future posts! more »
by
Ronald
on Tue 16 Aug 2005 12:28 AM EDT
Monday, August 15
by
Ronald
on Mon 15 Aug 2005 11:09 PM EDT
Broadband Reports has a story on Firefox - apparently, there is some controversy on the recent results that seem to indicate a slippage in growth for the Microsoft Internet Explorer alternative. However, if the blogsphere is any decent indicator, it is IE that seems to be slipping (e.g. Rodrigo's site). For TF, most of the viewership is still in various IE flavors, however, the actual share of Firefox has been holding steady in the 15-25% mark. Interestingly enough, there are a decent number of Netscape, Opera, Safari and Mozilla TF readers out there as well. more »
by
Ronald
on Mon 15 Aug 2005 08:33 PM EDT
Tom Keating had a post in which he references a Skype Forum chat that mentions that China Telecom is engaged in blocking Skype access:
Only a matter of time before bureaucrats there figure out this loophole and close it. But while it is relatively easy for the Chinese to block SkypeOut, Skype is another matter altogether - with the peer-to-peer / supernode architecture, this is not an easy task. Which brings up the question on the supernode: I suspect that its selection is not arbitrary (i.e. Skype probably assigned a number of its own supernodes around the world right from the start, in order to be able to get some reasonable grade-of-service, particularly for paying customers). If that were the case, after some hacking, could there be a way to block communication if the IP address lies within certain ranges, no? It would probably take a bit of time to trace all of those, and by that time, a whole lot of the Internet would be blocked, but unfortunately, that probably already happens in some regions of this world. more »Sunday, August 14
by
Ronald
on Sun 14 Aug 2005 07:27 PM EDT
As a follow-up to yesterday's blurb about VCs investing in media (in which I quoted from a note written by Om Malik, where he used a couple of recent examples in Odeo and Podshow), I went around looking for some insights into what the winning business model would be for podcasts. Along the way, I found the same skepticism as Om (for instance, Dragos from @rgumente). But then, I found some interesting insights from down under in Australia. It turns Cameron Reilly also had a previous entry in his blog, where he referenced another insight from Doc Searls. Fair enough, advertising is the usual modus operandi, but I echo Dragos' sentiment of how hard it is to accurately determine the return of an ad in an audio file. Just because the file was downloaded, it does not mean it has been heard (I confess that I have a few podcasts that I downloaded that I have yet to listen to - and plan to do so on my next trip). So here's an idea: what about combining two current disruptive technologies - syndication and podcasting and coming up with "syndicated podcasts"? While this might seem funny, I am thinking a bit bigger than simply RSS here. The key advantage of a podcast is the low production costs associated with it. Why wouldn't it make sense for a progressive radio station to devote a certain percentage of time of its programming to a regular podcast show (that it can pick from a select list of recordings). If the radioheads believe the podcast producer is good and has some potential, they can carry the program on the air! It's simple, easy and a quick way to cut costs for those late night programs. And it might give some podcast enthusiasts a shot at making it to the airwaves. The model would work more or less like this: the radio station compensates a certain percentage of the commercial proceeds to the podcasters (the producers and the folks enabling the production, doing the hosting, etc. would have to work out their take, but an agreement that is amenable to all parties can be reached). This could be made interesting: for instance, a program possibility could be the closest thing to reality TV in a radio station, or a sports satire, etc. If the podcast achieves a certain audience, it can then be turned into a "syndicated" radio program;-) The initial "syndication" is straightforward - just putting the MP3 file out there for anybody to listen. This can also be a great way for a radio station to add a bit of foreign content really cheaply. I would appreciate hearing some feedback on further refinements to this idea or other podcast models. more »
by
Ronald
on Sun 14 Aug 2005 01:26 PM EDT
So why weren't too many of those models sold in Canada? According to this article, the first generation Prius (priced just at $30k) was a little larger than the Corolla, but cost nearly twice as much as a base Corolla model, so it didn't make too much sense for the average consumer. The 2004 edition, however, is much bigger than the original one ans still costs the same ($29,990). Throwing in the $1,000 cheque that the Ontario and BC provincial governments are offering, and the recent hike in gas prices, all of a sudden, this starts making a lot of sense. Note: I saw that the US is also offering an added incentive for environmentally friendly car buyers (via a tax break), and don't know how that compares with the $1,000 Canadian offer. more »Saturday, August 13
by
Ronald
on Sat 13 Aug 2005 01:24 PM EDT
by
Ronald
on Sat 13 Aug 2005 01:12 PM EDT
Om Malik writes about how the good times apparently are back on Sand Hill Road, with VCs starting to have the same appetite for risky investments as they did in the late 90's (except that perhaps these days, VCs are seeking only entrepreneurs with a proven track record and hence, they are getting better leverage). Here are a few recent investments that Om brings up in his note: Om argues that all these VCs are seeking for the next SixApart, but the key question is how many SixAparts are out there? Maybe one or two podcasting investments will pay off, but how many VCs out there are investing in that? From a pragmatic standpoint, it may really seem that some VCs are stepping outside their comfort zones, thinking that it's better to at least try to make something happen in domains such as RSS, social networking, etc. than to miss on the next bonanza. more »
by
Ronald
on Sat 13 Aug 2005 12:26 PM EDT
Friday, August 12
by
Ronald
on Fri 12 Aug 2005 09:03 AM EDT
by
Ronald
on Fri 12 Aug 2005 08:59 AM EDT
by
Ronald
on Fri 12 Aug 2005 08:23 AM EDT
James Enck writes about the results of a few Euro telco incumbents and they all have something in common: accelerating fixed line losses. Consider the following: It will not be surprising to see these players look at innovative ways to stop those losses, and one of those will be fixed-mobile convergence (via IMS). more »Thursday, August 11
by
Ronald
on Thu 11 Aug 2005 12:53 PM EDT
Robert suggested that for a US$ 3 billion valuation, each Skype user is worth $150. Is that realistic? In my previous Skype valuation note, I wrote that an annual ARPU of $50 per user for SkypeOut would be reasonable, along with a guess-estimate of $40 for SkypeIn, for a total of roughly $90 per customer (assuming the same customers sign in for both SkypeIn and Skype Out). So even for the paying customers, $150 represents 2/3 more than $90. But wait - that was just for paying customers - and the key variable is figuring out what percentage of the overall Skype installed base can be counted on to regularly subscribe to these services (most folks are guessing single digits thus far). Therefore, the US$3 billion valuation is huge! So based on these arguments, I honestly join the skeptics list. Skype might go public or be sold, but, in a "rational market", it should not be worth these huge multiples, unless I am missing something here (well, considering the recent action on search engine Baidu.com and on portal Alibaba.com, one might say: "it's the market, stupid!" and start wondering if we are about to get into yet another speculative bubble - to temper those thoughts, I recommend a good dosage of "creative destruction" courtesy of Schumpeter ;-). Last but not least, Mark Evans also has a Skype story today, and he talks about what might be motivating the company to talk to Morgan Stanley and explore its options (including possibly an IPO). He speculates on whether founder Niklas Zennstrom wants to cash in his gains now, considering the low barriers to entry or new potential threats (Mark mentions Michael Robertson's Gizmo service). If one were to buy into this last factor, I would also add Jeff Pulver's newly re-launched FWD (including the pulver.Communicator) to the list (and Jeff has one of the very best brains working on this project, namely Henry Sinnreich, the father of SIP, who recently joined Pulver.com after having a distinguished career at MCI). Another issue I would throw in the list is the fact that carriers will not stand pat (e.g. the BT Communicator). more »
by
Ronald
on Thu 11 Aug 2005 12:45 PM EDT
According to a press release on the Alibaba.com site, the Yahoo! rumors were proven to be correct and the pending deal mentioned here on Tuesday became official: Yahoo! and Alibaba.com Form Strategic Partnership in China.
by
Ronald
on Thu 11 Aug 2005 08:33 AM EDT
I had to disable anonymous comments due to unprecedented spam flood that Technology Futurist has been getting. Initially, I chose anonymous posting as the default as a way to encourage more comments, but unfortunately, this had to end. Lots of spamming going on in the blogsphere - this is a very sad development indeed. And spammers are getting more and more sophisticated every time, even creating "trackback spam" (on top of leaving spam comments). Scientific American had a good article back in April talking about spamming and even how it's made its way into the blogsphere. Luckily, Blogware has created tools that allow bloggers to blacklist frequent spammers and even prevent them from using trackback spam. But there is the issue of what to do with IP addresses when one considers DHCP - with DHCP, a spammer's IP address can change and you might end up blocking some other reader in the future. more »
by
Ronald
on Thu 11 Aug 2005 01:35 AM EDT
I came across a good article written by Joan Engebretson on the hot subject of IMS. Joan interviewed carriers such as Bell South and Sprint, and the discussions were very candid about the expectations about the technology and whether it can be the delivery mechanism for next-gen services. For good measure, she also sought the opinions of vendors like Lucent and three analysts (including Tom Nolle, Tom Valovic and yours truly). It was actually somebody from Lucent who pointed me to the article, and it was a great read. more »Wednesday, August 10
by
Ronald
on Wed 10 Aug 2005 11:56 PM EDT
A while back, Mark Evans and yours truly both read a Globe and Mail Saturday feature interview with Bell Canada CEO Michael Sabia. I meant to pick up on this thread but the work caught up with me, until today, while Googling around at work trying to uncover some Canadian telco data, I accidentally came across a great find. Like the saying goes - some great findings are truly accidental - and this was no exception to that adage. I discovered an editorial that Dr. Yves Rabeau wrote in the Financial Post back in August of 2004. Dr. Rabeau has impressive credentials, including a Ph.D. in Economics from my alma mater (MIT) and is Professor of Business Strategy in the Faculty of Management Science at UQAM and Director at the MEI - Montreal Economic Institute).
The "Schumpeterian Wave" is very well described in the discussion - long waves of innovations both create and destroy wealth. However, the net long-term effect is positive, because innovation eventually brings productivity gains which enhance the living standards in the economy. Of course these innovation cycles bring about some major turmoil - new firms and existing ones that can adopt the new technologies can thrive under this environment, whereas others eventually vanish because they cannot make the necessary adjustments. But the central theme of the paper is to determine whether, if telecom regulation were in tune with the changing technology and the competitive landscape, this could have limited excesses such as the telecom speculative bubble. More importantly, the study also raises a few very important questions about what role the CRTC should pursue, and whether or not the goal of achieving a healthy level of competition in the local markets is a realistic one. The big question asked is - while trying to balance the interests of new competitors with those of the incumbents, will the CRTC end up in an "economic impasse" (where it seeks to create a competitive regime that is not naturally cost-effective) that will also curtail the flexibility of the incumbents? more »
by
Ronald
on Wed 10 Aug 2005 12:17 AM EDT
Enterprise revenues jumped considerably (33% QoQ), due to the recognition of previously deferred revenues (~$100 million) related to specific PBX software upgrades in the U.S. and Europe. However, no mention of the much anticipated MPE9000 IP router (also known as the Neptune), and the book-to-bill ratio came a bit under what was expected (0.84). More importantly, almost all the Nortel enterprise voice (PBX/IP PBX) competitors had great quarters: Cisco, Avaya, Mitel, Inter-Tel and Aastra. On the wireless side, CDMA was the bright spot, with performance being driven by EV-DO sales to players such as Bell Canada, Sprint and Verizon. However, the GSM revenues were lower, due to the completion of a major contract in Europe and lower than anticipated sales to BSNL. Finally, wireline saw declines in long-haul optical and traditional circuit switching for voice and ATM switches for data, although these drops were compensated by higher sales in VoIP switches and metro optical gear. It would have been nice to see more detail on the Verizon Class5 switch replacement project. All in all, a good quarter, considering the recent turmoil, but there is $1.3 billion worth of debt coming due in early 2006, and more visibility on the company's strategy will be helpful for most investors. Despite the jump in revenues, Nortel turned in an EPS of 1 penny, so cost cutting will need to continue. more »Tuesday, August 9
by
Ronald
on Tue 09 Aug 2005 09:07 AM EDT
by
Ronald
on Tue 09 Aug 2005 01:36 AM EDT
Monday, August 8
by
Ronald
on Mon 08 Aug 2005 11:58 PM EDT
For those of you not familiar with British papers, let me tell you that the Sunday versions often come with some juicy gossip (M&A rumors, takeovers, tenders, etc.). However, unfortunately more often than not, there is also a lot of speculation. Case in point: The Sunday Business in London, which yesterday had a wild story that Cisco would make a pitch for Nokia. That must have obviously worked very well from a PR perspective, as today I got a call from a Brazilian journalist seeking my comments on this. But how likely is this deal? Anybody that knows anything about the Cisco traditional M&A strategy would tell you that this is just plain speculation to sell some papers, because this is 100% incompatible with the classic Cisco acquisition philosophy: buy small pieces that you can chew and then use the rapid integration GE model. There are many examples throughout the past few years: Selsius (the IP PBX division of Intecom), Unity (UM division of Active Voice), Geotel, and more recent purchases such as P-Cube, Airespace, Sipura, Topspin, etc. What all of these companies have in common is that they are small and represent niche plays in areas that Cisco wanted/wants to grow in (again, at the time Cisco made the acquisition -of course, the IP PBX and IPCC grew a lot, but Cisco bought Selsius back in 1999 when IP PBXs were mostly deployed in labs ;-). Besides being small in size, they all have excellent revenue growth potential, well above Cisco's current 10-15% level. However, a Nokia buy would curtail Cisco's ability to reach its 10-15% growth target in 2006 (most Wall Street analysts forecast Nokia sales to grow 8% YoY in 2006). So why so much speculation? Well, both companies (Cisco and Nokia) did form a small enterprise VoIP alliance, but things never evolved above and beyond this partnership. So will Cisco go after Nokia? Not very likely. And I would dare say that even, per absurdum, if Cisco's new CDO (Charlie Giancarlo) were to embark on a new and more daring M&A strategy, there would be other companies that would better suit Cisco's interest, including Nortel (a very remote possibility, given the massive sea of red/employee layoffs that such a merger would entail, but imagine for a second what Cisco would look like with Nortel's wireline and wireless carrier divisions ;-). I think at least that one is a juicier Sunday paper read. more »
by
Ronald
on Mon 08 Aug 2005 12:05 AM EDT
The stakes are pretty high - the Australian government is planning to sell its 52% share in Telstra next year (at a price tag of roughly 24 billion US$), and the coalition partner wants the rural service guarantees to remain in force even after the sale. more »Sunday, August 7
by
Ronald
on Sun 07 Aug 2005 11:13 PM EDT
But it is interesting to see the growth in usage of these tools. The articles mentions a Hitwise stat about traffic in these sites being up 26% year-over-year, and that one in every five people leave a map site to go to an online travel agent. So this could become a natural extension to sites such as Hotwire, Orbitz, Travelocity, Expedia, etc. more »
by
Ronald
on Sun 07 Aug 2005 01:53 PM EDT
For a monthly fee of 30 Euros (about Can$45), Free offers 20 Mbps ADSL2+ access, unlimited local and national telephony (recall that in Europe, the "impulse" for local calls is often charged), 80 digital TV channels (with an option to get 200) and a selection of digital radio stations. All of this delivered via a box that plugs into a user's TV, can also be hooked up to a stereo sytem and has built-in Wi-Fi to talk to a computer system. We can only dream as consumers to get a deal like this in our current competitive telecom landscape. But alas, to make us feel a bit better, Yannick does say that Free's offer is much further ahead of those available from other providers in countries such as the UK, Germany or Spain. But why settle for the lowest common denominator instead of shooting for the stars? The CRTC has a key role to play to establish the type of competition that would create the need for having such offerings in Canada. more »Saturday, August 6
by
Ronald
on Sat 06 Aug 2005 11:49 PM EDT
Dragos (from @rgumente) wrote about a ZDNet survey about what are the most widely used applications by cell phone users. A total of 2,112 Internet users were surveyed and here were their top replies:
It would be interesting to know the breakdown of the 24% e-mails usage (i.e. how many used smart phones such as the BlackBerry or Treo models versus mobile e-mail on traditional cell phones without QWERTY keypads). more »Friday, August 5
by
Ronald
on Fri 05 Aug 2005 11:57 PM EDT
Rodrigo writes about a new tool that resides at the bottom of the Firefox browser and can check on Google Adsense statistics such as the number of your Adsense ads, clicks/page view, eCPM, and the revenues you're making from the program. The gizmo is called Adsense Notifier and you can get it from this link. As a bonus, you can also get GMail status from the same site (called Mincus code). more »
by
Ronald
on Fri 05 Aug 2005 11:33 PM EDT
Update (Aug.7th) - Engadget has some more pictures of the Treo 670 here. more »Thursday, August 4
by
Ronald
on Thu 04 Aug 2005 11:58 PM EDT
Mark Evans writes about Rogers' and Bell's plans to reduce bundling discounts. He attributes this to the lack of a need to offer these incentives, as there is the so-called "convenience" factor of dealing with just one service providers. Granted that the Canadian consumer might not be as cost-conscious as other nations' consumers around the world, and in fact, convenience does play a role in choosing more than one service from the same provider. But I would be willing to bet that the other half of the story is the lack of a perfect (or as perfect as it gets) competitive market in the Canadian telecom landscape. The reason for that is manifold - in the wireless side, for instance, contraction was to blame (once Rogers took out the market disruptor - Fido - "price discipline" came back), on top of the lack of action by the CRTC vis-a-vis wireless local number portability. On the cable side, the DBS players (Bell Canada and Shaw) have not really given the Canadian MSOs (Rogers, Shaw, Videotron, Cogeco, etc.) a run for their money. Not that I expected Shaw to cannibalize its own cable revenues, but at least ExpressVu could have made things interesting here in Ontario. But the last salvo was the CRTC VoIP decision, which really took out any chance of any significant price cuts for local service. So is there really any surprise not to see any bundling discount? There is no major incentive, as "price discipline" rules and maximizes profits for these companies. Only when we have a more competitive system in place will bundling discounts come into play. more »
| |||













Another proof point of VoIP's uptake: VoIP has made it in
It is with a lot of sadness that
The recent run-up in oil prices is definitely increasing the interest in fuel efficiency and environment-friendly solutions. One model discussed
Yes, this is quite possible! My wife (the Mac person in this house) pointed me out the following
Tim Higgins has posted a
Here's an interesting project from the
Gizmodo is reporting on
Lots of stories in the blogsphere about Skype, including its imminent IPO.
More importantly, at the bottom of the web page article, I discovered a link to an excellent discussion paper authored by Dr. Rabeau that I wanted to share with TF readers. The study is called "
Nortel finally
After being held up a day due to bad weather in Florida, space shuttle Discovery soared across the Pacific and over Southern California, going through a route just north of Los Angelese
The Internet / consumer portal sweepstakes have never been higher, with the recent stunning debut of Baidu.com Inc. (
There was an
I came across an interesting
Here's what I was talking about when I meant that the Canadian consumers get at best a so-so deal in terms of pricing for broadband, TV and LD. Yannick Laclau (hat tip:
Lots of people in the blogsphere are talking about the new Treo 670, which runs on Windows Mobile 5.0, and is rumored to have a lot more extra gizmos (a 1.3 megapixel camera, EV-DO and Bluetooth). Here are some